Bottom Line

The Dream Pairs Mid-Calf boots are an excellent budget option for beginners or those looking to save money. When we tested these boots alongside other models in real-world conditions, we found that despite some flaws, they offer good performance for the price.

We were pleased to see that these boots are quite light for their size, weighing only 18 ounces or 1.2 pounds. The lightweight design was noticeable during walking or hiking. We could wear them for hours without experiencing fatigue. Another impressive feature was the traction, which was surprisingly good considering the low profile of the tread.

We do wish these boots had better water resistance and warmth. Some of this is due to materials that are less expensive than those used in other women’s winter boots on the market. We also got a bad blister at one point because the boots lost their shape.

Overall, buyers should be prepared for reduced durability over the long term, correlating with the lower price point. However, we believe most of the other negatives can easily be addressed and that these boots perform well enough to more than justify the price point. If these aren’t the type of winter boots you’re looking for, check out our full list of women’s winter boots.

How We Tested

We wore the Dream Pairs boots around Durango, Colorado, during casual walks, at the office, and on snow hikes. The walk and hike distances were usually around five miles each time, although we also wore them for up to 12 hours during the day.

Weight

The Dream Pairs Mid-Calf Boots are surprisingly lightweight for a taller, snow-compatible boot. When we weighed one, it came in at 18 ounces, just over a pound. Compared to other tall boots like the Bogs Arcata and Sorel Caribou, the Dream Pairs are nearly a pound lighter boot. 

The difference in weight is noticeable on the trail. The lighter design makes it easier to maneuver on snowy and dry surfaces alike. We really appreciated this when playing with our dog during a hike in the San Juan mountains. It also results in less foot fatigue when worn for long periods.

We wore these boots for over 12 hours one day at our office job, and they felt about the same as wearing a regular work shoe. One thing to keep in mind is that some of the weight reduction probably comes from cheaper, less durable materials. However, considering the price point, the lightweight design is a big advantage for these boots.

Water Resistance

For brief or mild water exposure, the Dream Pairs Mid-Calf boots are adequate, but don’t expect them to withstand large amounts. To evaluate water resistance, we submerged each boot from our lineup in a bathtub filled with enough water to cover the toe. We used rocks to weigh down the boots. Every five minutes or so, we checked for signs of water ingress and noted the time when they became wet.

During this test, we found that the Dream Pairs boots were completely wet inside in less than 35 minutes. They had standing water inside at that point and probably wetted out a bit earlier. This is disappointing and would be a serious problem while hiking. 

Based on our experience with these boots, they do stay dry with minimal water. We used them while walking on a recreational path during a light drizzle, and they stayed warm and dry the entire two-hour walk.

Likewise, we deliberately tried to walk through puddles during testing, and they always remained dry during those quick submersions. Overall, we wouldn’t rely on these boots in wet climates or areas with large amounts of standing water, but they are adequate for snow or drier conditions areas.

Warmth

Although the Dream Pairs website claims a temperature rating of -25°F, the Mid-Calf boots fell short in warmth during testing. To evaluate warmth, we placed these boots in a snow drift to monitor the internal temperature over 30 minutes. They started fairly warm, but the inside temperature quickly dropped, placing them near the bottom of our lineup.

In real-world conditions, we found the warmth to be sufficient for moderate winter weather. Walking around town in drizzle, shoveling snow, and hiking in sunny conditions near Durango, Colorado, were all comfortable while wearing the Dream Pairs boots. The faux fur and knitted collar also provide a cozy feeling of warmth. However, for extreme conditions or situations where warmth is critical, we would likely opt for another option.

Comfort

Comfort with the Dream Pairs Mid-Calf boots can vary depending on usage and limited features. We ranked each boot based on the number of comfort features to provide a fair comparison across our lineup. We appreciate that the Dream Pairs boots are available in sizes 5-12 and can be returned if they do not feel comfortable.

The ability to adjust the fit with laces and the faux fur lining are also positive aspects of this model. Additionally, the knit collar offers a unique comfort feature. However, improvements could include offering half sizes, removable inserts, and a wider toe box. 

Our experience walking and hiking in these boots was very inconsistent. Some days, we could walk for hours without any foot fatigue or rubbing. However, on one occasion, we experienced severe rubbing on the Achilles tendons of both feet while wearing these boots.

During a five-mile walk in rainy conditions, blisters formed that took over a week to heal. We were able to wear these boots again without rubbing afterward, but we recommend wearing thicker socks with them to prevent blisters. Since the blisters were caused by material quality and craftsmanship issues, where the boot shaft folded inward, we deducted some points from the Dream Pairs boots to reflect this problem.

Overall, we believe that being aware of the limitations of budget boots and adjusting layering accordingly can help reduce some of the negatives for those seeking an affordable option boot.

Traction

The Dream Pairs Mid-Calf boots have average traction with lackluster tread. When evaluating traction, tread pattern is important. Specifically, we look for increased surface area to improve grip on slick surfaces.

The Dream Pairs boots don’t have much tread height, although they do have a fair amount of texture. We didn’t expect much grip, but we were surprised to see an average performance during our side-by-side traction test. When we placed these boots on the rock of the traction arm and lifted, they stayed put long enough to beat half of the boots in our previous test lineup. 

While wearing these boots on ice patches around Durango, Colorado, we found their performance to be unremarkable. Nothing notable stood out, whether good or bad. The same was true when hiking on snowy trails near Purgatory ski area. Our overall experience with the Dream Pairs boots on slick surfaces was neutral.

Should You Buy the Dream Pairs Mid-Calf Boots?

The Dream Pairs aren’t perfect, but there’s a reason we listed them among the best winter hiking boots: value. These boots cost 2-5 times less than other boots in our selection.

They offer an affordable option that still performs well, making them a good choice for beginners or those needing something for now. We recommend them for people who need a boot that works in snowy or dry conditions and who don’t mind replacing them eventually when they wear out.

What Other Women’s Winter Boots Should You Consider?

We’ve tested many boots, so if you’re unsure about the Dream Pairs, check out some of these other options from women’s winter boot gear guide:

Sorel Caribou Review: Tried and true, the Sorel Caribou boots are a classic winter choice. Similar in design to the Dream Pairs, but made with higher-quality materials, those with a larger budget might want to splurge or upgrade to these instead.

Ugg Adirondack III Review: Another boot with a similar design, but a higher price, the Ugg Adirondack boots score well in our tests. The wool lining makes these boots incredibly warm, and they performed well in the water resistance test. Just be prepared for the additional cost materials.

Columbia Minx Shorty Review: The Columbia Minx Shorty boots are another favorite budget option of ours. Like the Dream Pairs, they tend to wet out quickly and aren’t as warm as some other choices. However, they are comfortable and lightweight, offering a lot of value table.

Bottom Line

Xtratuf boots are beloved in winter climates for their excellent traction and waterproof design. We love our pair of Xtratuf boots, which we bought while living in Alaska, so much that we had to include them in our list of best winter boots. During side-by-side testing, we confirmed much of what we already knew from extensive use. First, they perform great in wet and slippery conditions.

The boots stayed dry after over two hours of submersion in water. They also scored well on our traction measuring device and gave us confidence walking on snow- and ice-covered surfaces. 

Some downsides of the Xtratufs include the lack of insulation, a heavier design, and limited options for customizing comfort. During winter hikes in both Alaska and Colorado, we have noticed that the toes can get a bit chilly while standing around in these boots.

Additionally, the neoprene materials and tall shaft inherently make them weigh more than some other boots.

However, these issues are minimal or easily fixed with thicker socks. Overall, we will always keep a pair of Xtratufs in our closet for rainy days, snowy hikes, and long winter walks on the beach. If these aren’t the type of winter boots you’re looking for, check out our full list of women’s winter boots.

How We Tested

We have been using and hiking in Xtratuf boots for many years, starting with our first pair while living in Alaska. We’ve used these boots for outdoor chores in winter, walks along Katchemak Bay in Homer, AK, and hikes in both the Kenai and San Juan areas. 

Weight

The Xtratuf 15” Legacy boots were some of the heaviest we tested due to their heavier neoprene design and tall shaft height. When we weighed one on our kitchen scale, it came in at 28 ounces, or 1.7 pounds.

This was comparable to most of the other tall rubber boots we evaluated. It was disappointing to see that they weighed slightly more than the Bogs Neo Classic Tall, despite having less insulation.

From our experience, buying Xtratufs that fit well really helps reduce how heavy they feel during use. We’ve been hiking on beaches and in snow with

Xtratufs for years, and boots that are too big can feel quite heavy on your feet in a short time. Properly sized boots are easier to walk in, although they still require more effort than some lighter options models.  

Water Resistance

The Xtratuf 15″ Legacy boots excel in water resistance. Their neoprene design is 100% waterproof, as confirmed through both quantitative and qualitative testing. To compare them with other boots, we placed them in a bathtub filled with water, enough to cover the toes.

After adding a rock to prevent floating, we started a timer and checked the inside every five minutes. The Xtratuf boots remained completely dry after more than two hours in the water. 

One of our favorite uses for these boots is during winter hikes where water is involved. For example, we enjoy walking the beaches near Homer, Alaska, all year round. These boots have always kept our feet dry as long as nothing falls in over the top. On more traditional hikes, they are perfect for stream crossings or wet snow. If moisture is a major concern, then the Xtratuf boots are a fantastic choice.

Warmth

Although the Xtratuf 15″ Legacy boots were made in Alaska and are essentially the state footwear, they lack any insulation and are the coldest among the boots we tested. To evaluate their warmth, we buried the toes and heel in a snowbank and measured the internal temperature with an infrared thermometer. We recorded readings every 5 minutes to compare how temperatures changed over time. From the first measurement, the inside of the Xtratufs was colder than all the other boots. Throughout the test, the temperatures were similar to those of a pair of trail runners we used as a control. 

In the field, we often find the Xtratufs to feel chilly whether hiking the Resurrection Pass trail in Alaska or walking through snow in Colorado’s San Juan Mountains. Part of this is due to the neoprene construction with just a basic inner lining.

We usually try to pair these boots with warmer socks, and it may be helpful to consider that when choosing a size. Although the toes can often feel cold in these boots, it’s less noticeable when moving and has never been a problem when hiking in temperatures down to the low 20’s.

Comfort

The Xtratuf 15″ Legacy boots either will or will not be comfortable, as there are limited ways to address pain points. Since comfort varies greatly between individuals, we focused mainly on the number of adjustment points available to modify the boot’s comfort when ranking models in this category.

Features like laces, a wide range of sizes including half sizes, and the availability of wide toe boxes were among the aspects we looked for, though the Xtratufs lack some of these. However, we were pleased to find that they have removable insoles, allowing orthotics or custom insoles to be added if needed to increase comfort. We also appreciate that they can be returned if they are uncomfortable for the wearer. 

It’s important to note that although the Xtratuf boots didn’t score very high in comfort, we’ve never found them uncomfortable. We’ve spent many days wearing these boots on beach walks in Alaska and on winter hikes without any signs of discomfort. We believe this is true for many people, as these boots are very popular in the Last Frontier state. The only reason we ranked them lower is that if they don’t fit your foot shape well, there’s little that can be done to fix it short of returning them and trying a different pair boot.

Traction

Xtratuf boots are known for their great traction in slippery conditions, which is why they are a top choice for fishermen working on boats in Alaska. The tread on Xtratufs is less aggressive than some dedicated hiking boots but features a lot of surface area. When we tested these boots on our traction device, they climbed up to a 45° slope before slipping and falling. This places them in the upper tier of boots we tested for traction.

Though we can’t claim to have worn them on a wet boat, we have used the Xtratuf boots on various slick surfaces. We have hiked with them over wet rocks on the beach, on wet wharfs, icy roads, and snowy trails. Throughout it all, they have provided reliable traction, and the fall risk has always felt minimized low. 

Should You Buy the Xtratuf 15″ Legacy Boots?

The Xtratuf 15″ Legacy boots have notable strengths and obvious weaknesses to consider before purchasing. Their neoprene build and tall shaft make them ideal for wet conditions, including prolonged submersion. They also offer good traction, which is helpful on wet rocks and ice.

Additionally, they are easy to slip on and off, making them a great choice to keep by the door in winter or as transition shoes before skiing. Those concerned about adjustability, warmth, or lighter weight should look elsewhere however.

What Other Women’s Winter Boots Should You Consider?

Not quite what you’re after? Check out our women’s winter boot gear guide: or some comparable models below:

Bogs Arcata Review: One of our editor’s picks, we love how versatile the Bogs Arcata boots are. Though they aren’t as tall as the Xtratuf boots, they feature handles for easy slip-on, faux-lined fur and insulation for warmth, plus a lighter weight. We appreciate that they remain highly waterproof with decent tread.

Bogs Neo Classic Tall Review: Similar in height and featuring a waterproof design, the Bogs Neo Classic Tall boots are a great alternative to the Xtratuf boots. Those seeking extra warmth will appreciate the insulated design of these Bogs. 

Sorel Caribou Review: Like the Xtratuf boots, the Sorel Caribou has a long-standing reputation for quality and performance. These boots are designed with snow in mind for those who want warmer boots with more adjustability.

Bottom Line

The Salomon Toundra Pro boots are one of our favorite winter boots for hikes in rugged conditions. To test them out, we conducted a series of side-by-side experiments and wore them on hikes around Durango, Colorado, as well as into the office.

One thing we discovered through these tests is that these boots have incredible tread! Not only did they excel on our traction machine, but we have never felt as secure walking on ice as we did in these boots. Another area of praise is the warm insulation and faux fur lining. These boots felt warm, sometimes a bit too much so, on all kinds of hikes. 

No piece of gear is perfect. When it comes to the Toundra, we wish they were a bit lighter on the feet. On drier terrain, in particular, they can feel slightly heavy by the end of the hike. It was also disappointing to find out that they will wet out after about an hour of full submersion. However, they perform well with short durations in water. 

Overall, we were impressed with how well these boots performed in a few key areas, and their consistent performance across the board makes them a new favorite on our list of women’s winter boots.

How We Tested

We tested the Toundra boots in the snowy San Juan Mountains of Colorado. These boots were mainly used for day hikes in both dry and snowy conditions. We also wore them to the office and around town to put extra miles on them. 

Weight

The Salomon Toundra Pro boots are similar in weight to, or slightly heavier than, other hiking-specific boots. Some of this can be attributed to the features it offers, such as taller shaft height and aggressive tread. According to our scale, the boots weighed 22 ounces, placing them in the middle of our lineup. This was also consistent with or slightly heavier than many of the other hiking-specific boots we tested, such as the Keen Revel Polar and Oboz Bridger boots. 

On the trails, we found these boots to feel a bit heavy on the feet, especially in drier conditions. In snowy environments, the weight was less noticeable due to the uneven terrain and icy surfaces. That said, hiking in them was a bit more tiring than with some of our lighter models. We also wore these boots for over 8 hours in the office and hardly noticed the weight throughout the day.

The takeaway? These boots are slightly heavy, which can lead to increased fatigue during hikes, even if it’s not immediately apparent. Still, it’s a small tradeoff for some of the other features this boot offers. 

Water Resistance

We were surprised to see the Salomon Toundra boots become wet after just an hour of submersion. Considering their sturdy build and gusseted tongue, we expected them to resist water better. However, during our side-by-side test, they simply didn’t hold up. 

We submerged the boots in water up to the bottom of the tongue and weighed them down with a rock. While monitoring, everything seemed normal until we noticed water seeping in through the side panel. Luckily, the inside of the boot was only damp instead of soaked, but it was enough to get our socks wet. 

During testing, we tried to find opportunities to walk through puddles with these boots. Quick submersions were never enough to soak through, and we had no issues with snow while hiking. This indicates that the Toundra boots are suitable for drier snow and trail conditions, but other boots might be better for long-term use in wet conditions climates.

Warmth

The Salomon Toundra performed well in cold conditions and is one of our top choices for dedicated hiking boots that keep you warm. When we buried these boots in snow for our side-by-side test, we were impressed to see that they matched the performance of the leading boots. We used an infrared thermometer to measure the temperature inside and took readings every five minutes. The temperatures we recorded were higher than average compared to all the other boots we tested. 

In the field, we appreciate how cozy the faux fur is, which lends a feeling of warmth. On early-morning hikes on snow and ice in Durango, Colorado, our feet always stayed warm in these boots with regular hiking socks. Even when plowing through deep powder near Little Molas Lake, our toes remained warm. 

Of course, the trade-off is that these boots can feel a bit too warm during shoulder season hikes. We experienced this firsthand with sweaty feet while hiking the Log Chutes trail system near Durango. Overall, these boots are among our top choices for colder conditions hikes. 

Comfort

For comfort, the Salomon Toundra Pro boots feature multiple adjustability points and a taller shaft height, which result in a better fit. Since comfort is highly subjective from person to person, we focused on customization when comparing different models side-by-side. We rated the Toundra boots based on availability in half sizes, removable insoles, adjustable laces, a return policy, and faux fur lining.

Sizing, insoles, and laces all allow users to personalize or modify these boots for a better fit. We also found that faux fur lining makes the boots feel cozier and more comfortable to wear. The option to return boots that are uncomfortable offers the opportunity to try them out without full commitment. 

In the field, we found these boots to be relatively comfortable to wear. Besides feeling a little heavy in some conditions, we didn’t experience any foot fatigue or find any rub spots. The taller shaft reduces the chances of rubbing on the side of the ankle where the fibula and tibia bones meet the foot. Overall, we like how comfortable they are and will keep wearing them in various situations environments.

Traction

The Salomon Toundra Pro boots are one of our favorites for use on ice and other slick surfaces. We are truly impressed with how these boots performed in both our side-by-side and field tests. When we tested them on our traction device, they stayed on the rock longer than any other boots we tried. This matched our experience in the field, where they showed excellent traction.

We were especially excited to find that they gripped pure ice, the kind created by frequent freezing and thawing of snow, so well that walking a large dog was easy. We have never had such an experience with other boots, and the difference in grip was noticeable when we wore different ones afterward. We would happily recommend these boots for use in terrain where traction matters. 

Should You Buy the Salomon Toundra Pro Boots?

The Salomon Toundra boots have many excellent features that make them suitable for more technical winter hikes. Their warm interior and sturdy tread make hiking on cold, icy terrain easier.

They might feel a bit heavy on the feet, so although this is less noticeable in the snow, other boots could be a better choice where distance matters. Similarly, they can handle brief submersions in water but are not ideal for very wet conditions climates. 

What Other Women’s Winter Boots Should You Consider?

If the Salomon Toundra’s aren’t for you, consider checking out these winter hiking boots that we tested for our women’s winter boot gear guide:

Oboz Bridger 7” Insulated Review: Our top choice for women’s winter boots, the Oboz Bridger boots share many benefits with the Toundras. They are similarly weighted and have excellent tread. They also offer better water resistance and adjustability.

Merrell Thermo Chill Mid Review: Another hiking-focused boot, the Merrell Thermo Chill boots feature a lighter design with decent water resistance. In many ways, they are a less rugged version of the Toundras.

Keen Revel IV Polar Review: The Keen Revel Polar boots are designed for snow hiking, featuring good tread and gaiter attachments. These are another great option for hikes in drier conditions climates.

Bottom Line

The Duluth Dry on the Fly pants have quickly become one of our favorite pairs of women’s hiking pants after thorough side-by-side and field testing. We constantly find ourselves choosing these pants to wear on hikes, backpacking trips, to the office, on dog walks, and for errands around town. 

Our tester even wore them to sheep herding lessons with their dog. The main reasons they are our new go-to are: they have the most pockets of any pair of pants we tested, belt loops, and good durability. It is possible to fit a wallet, dog waste bags, phone, power bank, and dog leashes in just the hip pockets alone! 

Not everything about the Dry on the Fly is perfect. The cargo style and thicker fabric mean these pants aren’t quite as lightweight and comfortable to wear as some of the joggers in our lineup. They will also need to be paired with rain pants for anything more than a drizzle.

When it comes to value, the Dry on the Fly pants feel reasonably priced. Because they performed so well in our tests and in the field, they offer good value for the price. We would certainly buy these pants again, and you can probably find us wearing them, whether out on the trail or around town. 

How We Tested

The Dry on the Fly pants are so versatile that we wore them to our desk job, sheep herding lessons, the lake, around town, and, of course, out hiking. Trail testing involved wearing them on several fall backpacking trips in Colorado’s San Juan Mountains, primarily on well-maintained trails and tundra.

Comfort & Mobility

The Duluth Dry on the Fly pants are comfortable to wear all day on the trail and in town, but they have a noticeable downside compared to joggers. These pants fit and feel like cargo pants because of their numerous pockets and thicker material. 

During side-by-side testing, we found that these features resulted in less mobility. While wearing these pants, our tester lifted their leg until they felt resistance. We were then able to measure the distance from the ground to the top of the knee better to compare mobility to the other options we tested. The Dry on the Fly pants had some of the lowest heights measured for both legs. 

That said, for everyday use, we prefer wearing the Duluth pants over slacks, jeans, or other less versatile options. We find them to be more comfortable than most everyday pants. While backpacking in the San Juan Mountains of Colorado, we preferred other lightweight, minimalist pants compared to the dry-on-the-fly pants. However, we don’t think about it if we’re day-hiking in these pants. If we hadn’t been testing multiple pants, we likely would not have noticed. 

At the end of the day, there are certainly more comfortable options. However, it would be inaccurate to call the Duluth pants uncomfortable, and we still think they make a great choice due to all the other features they bring to the table.

Durability

Thick nylon and well-constructed seams mean the Duluth Dry on the Fly is a solid choice for durability. We looked at durability by performing both quantitative and qualitative tests. Our quantitative tests involved rubbing the fabric from each pair of pants on rough bark and a sharp stick. We looked for pulled threads, loose seams, and signs that the fabric may be thinning. After putting the Dry on the Fly pants through this test, we could not find any noticeable signs of wear. 

Qualitative testing involved wearing these pants on multiple hikes, on local walks, to work, at sheep herding lessons, and around the house. When changing between other pants in our lineup and the Duluth pants on a backpacking trip, it was obvious that the material is a bit heavy. The overall weight of the pants is 12 ounces, which is twice that of some of our other favs we tested. 

Though this can contribute to a lower comfort & mobility score, it also means that they are more durable. After wearing them all over the front and backcountry, we couldn’t find any appreciable signs of wear. With that in mind, they make a great choice for hikers who need a sturdy pair of pants.

Breathability

The thicker fabric of the Duluth Dry on the Fly pants results in a longer drying time, but the rollup hems and mesh pockets improve breathability. During side-by-side testing, we dipped approximately two inches of the lower leg into water, then set it out to dry with the other pants in our lineup. This allowed us to compare drying times in the same conditions. When we performed this test, the Duluth pants had a very similar drying time to other heavier material, traditional-style pants. The thicker material takes longer to wick away moisture, and the 97% nylon soaks up more moisture than some of the other pants we tested. This resulted in more water needing to evaporate off the pants, which adds to the dry time.

Out in the field, the drying time did not feel so long. When the pants got wet crossing a creek, they were mostly dry by the time we got back to town after a 30-minute drive. The rollup feature helps to prevent the hems from getting wet as well as provide more airflow. Combined with the mesh-lined hip pockets, we didn’t find these pants to feel overly hot when sitting in full sun at high altitude or when walking uphill. Overall, they performed better than expected, though there are some better choices available for hiking in hot climates.

Features

When it comes to features, the Duluth Dry on the Fly pants set a very high bar indeed. We counted eight pockets on the Duluth pants, seven of which are large enough to fit a phone. This is more than any other pair of pants we tested in our lineup, making these pants extremely versatile. The small pocket has a zipper, which makes it a great place to store keys or other valuables when out hiking. Envelope-style pockets on the lower legs and rear are easy to access, but secure. There is even a bonus built in pocket just the perfect size for a smartphone on the right leg. 

Our favorite feature of these pants has to be the hip pockets. They are some of the largest on any pants we have tested. We were able to fit phones, keys, poop bags, wallets, and dog leashes in them all at the same time! They feel very secure, and we never had an issue with phones falling out, even when there wasn’t much in them. 

Aside from pockets, we like having belt loops on these pants because it makes them very secure. No need to worry about them falling down when the pockets are full. It is one extra thing to buy and put on, but to us, it is worth it to have a better fit. The roll-up and snap ankles are nice for capri-mode. Overall, we feel Duluth has hit the mark on features, and these pants make a fantastic choice for those who value the versatility these features provide.

Weather Resistance

The Duluth Dry on the Fly pants are better able to resist moisture due to the thicker fabric, but are certainly not waterproof. We used a squirt bottle to spray each pair of pants on the thigh, then counted how many squirts it took to cause them to wet out. The Duluth pants resisted wetting out for about four squirts, which landed it slightly above average. They did not immediately feel wet the way some of the thinner fabric pants did. However, four squirts are not that many in the grand scheme of things. 

In the real world, this translates to being enough to resist moisture when brushing up against a wet branch or two. This also happened to be our experience when wearing the pants on a backpacking trip the day after a rainstorm. That said, we would recommend pairing the Duluth pants with rain pants if planning to use them in extremely wet conditions.

Should You Buy the Duluth Trading Co. Dry on the Fly Pants?

The Duluth Dry on the Fly pants make a great all-around option for hikers seeking a versatile pair of pants that can be used out on the trail and around town. They have more of the traditional look and feel, but look nice enough to wear at more casual jobs.

We loved all the pockets, both when backpacking and when out with our dogs to carry all their things. That said, those looking for the most comfortable option would be better off with a jogger.

What Other Hiking Pants Should You Consider?

 If the Duluth Dry on the Fly isn’t quite what you are looking for, be sure to check out some of the other hiking pants in our best hiking pants guide.

Kuhl Freeflex Rollup Review: The Freeflex pants are another one of our favorites for features, thanks to 6 functional pockets, rollup hems, and belt loops. Unlike the Duluth pants, the Freeflex pants also include a waist tie. We found them to be easier to move in, but not as weather-resistant. 

prAna Halle Straight II Review: The Halle pants have a similar cut, fabric, and feel to the Duluth pants, which makes them a great alternative. Unlike the Duluth pants, the Halle pants are slightly more water-resistant and easier to move in. However, the Dry on the Fly pants are the better choice for pockets and durability. 

Outdoor Research Ferrosi Review: The Ferrosi offers a great option for those who want something more water-resistant and comfortable. Like the Duluth pants, we enjoyed wearing these pants to the office and out on the trail, and found ourselves repeatedly choosing these pants for how comfortable they are. That said, they are not as durable and pill easily. 

Bottom Line

The Black Diamond Trail Back trekking poles make a fantastic choice for hikers on a budget or who don’t need any frills. These trekking poles performed as well as we expected, given their price tag.

While packability, weight, and ease of use take a slight hit to keep their price down, durability is where these poles truly shine. They are one of our top-performing trekking poles in this area. We trust them for taking the impact of downhill skiing in Colorado. They held up exceptionally well to moguls and pushing on flat stretches. Their durability, paired with the included winter baskets, means these poles are relatively versatile.

We also use them for varied terrain hikes in the summer and for other winter activities, such as snowshoeing. Overall, we appreciate that these poles offer an affordable option for people to get out. See how they compare to our other favorites in our best trekking poles gear guide.

Durability

The Black Diamond Trail Back is one of the most durable trekking poles we tested. During side-by-side testing, we threw them, dropped them on a boulder, and leaned on them to compare them to the other poles in our lineup. The Trail Back poles sustained a small amount of cosmetic scratching, but we never made a dent structurally. We were especially impressed with their performance in our stress test. While they did bend, they felt robust and difficult to snap. 

In addition to side-by-side testing, we also used these poles for downhill skiing. We specifically chose to use these poles due to their aluminum build. Aluminum tends to be more durable than carbon fiber. On the ski hill, we went down several black runs covered in several inches of fresh powder. We skied with total confidence with these poles in hand. We were able to put pressure on them when planting to make turns and push ourselves to the ski lift just fine.

Weight

Ultralight is not a focus area for the Trail Back. It was one of the heaviest models we tested at 9.7 ounces for one pole. This is also slightly heavier than the weight listed on Black Diamond’s website (likely due to the basket). 

Sure, it is a bummer that this pole is a bit heavier. But it is not a significant amount compared to most other poles (we are talking a couple of ounces). Plus, those few extra ounces are a matter of about $100 in savings, so for most, it is a worthy compromise.

Comfort

The Trail Back performs well in the comfort category thanks to soft wrist straps and easy-to-hold grips. While it would be nice to have some padding on the wrist strap, at least a fabric liner is inside. This makes it more comfortable to use than some of the more simplistic designs on the market. 

The grip is basic, but we prefer it over overly complex styles. Our biggest complaint is the lack of cork. This model has a foam grip that doesn’t give your sweat a place to go. In our experience, this leads to sweaty hands, which in turn become dirty.

Ease of Use

To compare all the poles we tested side-by-side, we timed how long it would take to expand each pole to the same height. 

The Trail Back Poles had one of the longest set extension times, so they earned one of the lowest scores. This is primarily due to the design of the flick locks and poles. The flick locks are very flush with the poles, and the amount of surface area available is limited. While this makes the locking mechanism more secure, it also means that adjustments are harder, especially with gloves or mittens. 

The other main issue with this model is that the pole segments are too close in size. There is friction between the poles while extending them, which requires more effort to finagle. 

On the bright side, there are measurement markers on both of the extending poles. We prefer having measurements as it makes it easier to set the poles to the same length every time.

Packability

Packability is another area of improvement for the Black Diamond Trail Back. These poles have the second-longest collapsed length of the group we tested. 

At 24 inches when fully collapsed, they are about a foot longer than some folding poles we tested. 

This can make a significant difference when trying to stow away poles on a pack when not in use or while traveling. One thing to remember is that telescoping poles will generally have a longer collapsed length than most folding poles. However, it would be nice if this pole could compete more with other telescoping poles in our lineup.

Features

The Trail Back has most of the baseline features we generally look for in a trekking pole, such as extra baskets, wrist straps, and replaceable carbide tips. After scoring the poles based on the number of features they offer, we found that the Trail Back poles scored above average. 

One notable feature of this pole is its grip extension. We appreciate that they allow for the pole to be held lower while climbing up a hill. However, we wish the grip extension was longer; the one on this model is relatively short compared to most other poles. 

We also appreciate that these poles come with both summer and winter baskets. This is one of the main reasons we use these poles for downhill skiing. One thing to note is that changing the baskets can be difficult on this model. While the baskets are threaded, it took a fair amount of force to remove the summer baskets and put the winter replacements on. 

Overall, these poles cover all the main features of a trekking pole, but some bonus features, such as tip covers and adjustable flick locks, would be nice additions.

Should You Buy The Black Diamond Trail back Trekking Poles?

While the Trail Back’s performance is not as strong as the other trekking poles we tested, we still think it is an excellent option for beginners or those on a budget. These poles are much more affordable than most other trekking poles we tested. They are also highly durable, making them a wonderful choice for hikers and skiers who want an all-in-one setup. We would not recommend these poles for gear nerds who want the latest and greatest, but they work just fine for the average hiker.

What Other Trekking Poles Should You Consider?

Are the following poles not quite what you are looking for? They share many similarities with the Trail Back trekking poles. 

Still stuck? Our trekking pole gear guide offers even more options worth exploring.

Trekology Trek-Z 2.0 Review: If budget is the biggest concern, then we recommend checking out the Trek-Z poles. These poles are heavier and less durable than the Trail Backs, but they have many positive attributes as well. We love that these poles collapse down to a very small size thanks to their folding design. They also come with many add-ons and features, providing a ton of value for the price.

Black Diamond Pursuit Review: One of our favorite trekking poles, the Black Diamond Pursuit is tied with the Trail Backs for our most durable model. We love that these poles are lightweight for aluminum poles. They are also shorter and more comfortable to use. Basically, these poles are Black Diamond’s upgraded version of the Trail Back for those who can afford to pay a bit extra.

MSR DynaLock Explore Review: The MSR DynaLock Explorers cost a little bit more but also perform a bit better than the Trail Backs overall. For example, they are easier to use, more compact, and offer slightly more features. Both models have very similar weights and comfort ratings. Side-by-side, they even have similar-looking grips. It will just come down to personal preference when choosing one.

Bottom Line

The Durston Icelines are one of our favorite trekking poles thanks to its innovative design, featherlight weight, and ease of use. These poles are unlike anything else we have ever tried, featuring a unique hybrid design that combines the benefits of folding and telescoping models. This design also makes them extremely fast and easy to set up. As one of the lightest poles we have tested, they make an excellent choice for backpackers who are focused on minimizing pack weight. 

While they are more durable than expected, they are still made of carbon fiber. They will inherently be more prone to snapping due to this material, which is something to bear in mind. Their design is also streamlined and minimalistic to help reduce weight. They do not have as many features as some of the other poles we tested.

Overall, we recommend these poles for gear junkies and ultralight backpackers. Still, those wanting something more versatile may want to explore other recommendations in our guide to the best trekking poles.

Durability

The Durston trekking poles perform well when you factor in their featherlight weight score and materials. During our side-by-side testing, we dropped these poles on a boulder and threw them like a javelin. The poles work normally after the tests, with minimal cosmetic damage. We also put these poles through a stress test. This involved planting them on the ground and leaning on them to see their strength. 

The Iceline poles did better than we expected; there was less bending than some, and they did not feel as frail as the other ultralight, carbon fiber poles in our lineup. We used these trekking poles while backpacking in the Chiricahua Mountains of Arizona. They helped us get through the snow on our way up to Chiricahua Peak. On the way down, they helped bash through the brush back down to the valley. Overall, we appreciate that these poles offer a terrific balance of durability and weight.

Weight

The Iceline trekking poles are one of the lightest we tested, making them an excellent option for those trying to shave every ounce they bring into the backcountry. We weighed these poles on our kitchen scale and a single Iceline pole weighed 5.5 ounces with both the wrist strap and basket. This is very close to our top performer and shows this model is a tremendous ultralight choice. 

While backpacking in the Chiricahua Mountains, we chose to bring this pole with us specifically for its uber ultralight weight. This was a huge pro when carrying it on our pack and hiking through the snow to Chiricahua Peak. It almost didn’t feel like we were even using poles while walking with them. Overall, the Iceline poles are a stellar option when weight is a priority.

Comfort

As an ultralight style pole, the Iceline trekking poles have minimal comfort features. Notably, while the shape and diameter of the trekking poles feel fine, they do not have cork or padded wrist straps. Compared to other models we tested, this puts them below average in comfort. 

Still, the foam handles are comfortable enough to use as they have a bit of give. However, they are not ideal for long-term use. Compared to cork, foam handles do not absorb shock from the ground as well. Sweat is another issue: it sits on the handles and causes the hand to get dirty. The wrist straps are thin and have a net-like pattern. While these will still get the job done, they do not feel as nice on the skin as a softer material. 

In the field, the shape and diameter of the grips meant they were still comfortable enough to use for a full day of hiking. There are just some better options on the market for comfort.

Ease of Use

The unique, hybrid folding and telescoping design makes these poles easy to set up. The lower pole section easily clicks into the upper portion with a ball and socket-style joint. A small mechanism holds the tip of the lower pole in place, and a button on the side releases it. 

One of the main reasons we wanted to test these trekking poles was their unique design, which is unlike anything else we have seen. There is also a flick lock tensioner to telescope the middle and upper portions of the trekking pole. This allows the length of the pole to be adjusted. It is very fast to pop the lower section into the slot and adjust the flick lock portion. The pole slides easily, and the tensioner is easy to use. There are even measurement markings to make it easier to adjust the length of the pole. 

This is our favorite design because of its uniqueness and efficiency.

Packability

Packability is an area where the Durston trekking poles perform above average. Generally, folding-style trekking poles are more packable, and telescoping models do not pack down as small. Therefore, it seems fitting that the Iceline poles, a hybrid of the two, fall between them. 

When we measured their length, they came in at 19.25 inches. It is distinctly longer than the folding poles and definitely shorter than any of the telescoping models. 

One thing to remember about these poles is that there isn’t anything holding them together. The upper and lower pole shafts are entirely separate when collapsed. This means that there is the potential to lose part of the pole when they are stowed away. 

To address this problem, we used the Dyneema storage bag that came with the poles while backpacking in the Chiricahua Mountains. This ensured that no pole segments would get lost, especially while bushwhacking. The bag is lightweight and surprisingly durable. It’s still a bit frustrating to have to deal with it, though.

Features

Features are another area where the Iceline trekking poles go with the bare minimum. We tallied how many valuable features each trekking pole model has and used that to help rank them. We looked at whether or not they had wrist straps, how many baskets came with them, and whether the carbide tips could be replaced. 

The Durston poles come with both wrist straps and one set of baskets. As mentioned in the comfort section, the wrist straps are basic and not the best to use for long periods. 

The baskets are an interesting case. Rather than coming with summer baskets, winter baskets, or both, the Iceline trekking poles come with baskets that are a hybrid of the two. They are larger than summer baskets but smaller than being dedicated for just winter. We also found them to be challenging to put on. It took us several minutes to wrestle them onto the pole. Fortunately, they also come with replaceable carbide tips, but that’s about it for features.

Should You Buy The Durston Iceline Trekking Poles?

We love the Durston Iceline trekking poles, but they are better for some situations than others. These poles are intended for ultralight backpacking and are some of the lightest on the market. 

While they were much more durable than we were expecting, they are still made of lightweight carbon fiber. This means they will be better suited to use on well-maintained trails where the goal is to travel light and fast. While they could theoretically be used for winter activities or rougher conditions, they will not thrive as much in those scenarios. They are expensive, but as long as the poles will be used for lightweight hiking, they should still be worth the price.

What Other Trekking Poles Should You Consider?

We tested several featherlight trekking poles, which you can learn more about below or in our trekking pole gear guide.

Gossamer Gear LT5 Review: A bit lighter than the Iceline trekking poles, the LT5 poles have a few more features, like tip covers, but less durability. We used the LT5 trekking poles on the same trips as the Durston poles, and they performed surprisingly well. Even when we used them on some rough, off-trail sections, they showed no signs of breaking. We aren’t sure we would trust them to catch us from a big fall, but they are a good alternative to the Iceline poles.

Black Diamond Distance Carbon FLZ Review: While these poles are geared more towards trail runners, they still make an excellent choice if weight is a concern. They are not as durable as the Iceline trekking poles, but we love how small they pack down. These poles are an excellent choice if they will be stowed away for much of the day.

Zpacks Minimalist Review: The Minimalist poles are also geared towards ultralight backpacking. Though their durability is not great, they are significantly more affordable than any other UL option. We also appreciate that they are available for purchase as a single pole or a set of two.

Bottom Line

The Leki Black Series FX Carbon trekking poles are a well-rounded option that performs well in every metric we tested (durability, weight, comfort, ease of use, packability, and features). 

One area where these poles shine is durability. They outperformed all the other folding poles we tested, even though they are made of carbon fiber. This helps ease the pain of the price point.

We also appreciate that they pack down small, though most other folding poles were smaller. At one pound for the pair, they are relatively heavy for a carbon pole. Then again, features such as a long grip extension and a folding design, which allows for a 16-inch collapsed length, justify the weight.

We used these poles on day hikes around the Durango, Colorado area and found that they are solid carbon and cork folding poles, but nothing stood out to us as five-star worthy. The only thing that shocked us was their hefty price tag, so we suggest dropping in only if you’ll get lots of use out of them. Otherwise, check out our other top recommendations in our guide to the best trekking poles.

Durability

The Leki Black Series trekking poles perform well under stress and are the top-performing folding model for durability. We tested these poles by throwing and dropping them on boulders. The Black Series poles had some cosmetic damage from the tests, but that’s par for the course for the life of a trekking pole.

We also performed a bend test, where we planted the pole in the ground and then leaned on it to see how easily it would bend vs. break. This particular pole had some curvature, but it did not feel like it would be easy to snap. 

On our local hikes around Durango, these poles held up well to everyday use for day hiking. Overall, these poles are an excellent choice for those who want a folding design with good durability.

Weight

The Black Series trekking poles are average in terms of weight.

 The Black Series came in at an even eight ounces for one pole – right in the middle of the pack. While the poles are made of carbon fiber, a lighter material, the handles are cork. Cork tends to be heavier than using foam. They also feature an extended grip that adds to the overall weight. We think these features are worth the uptick in weight.

On the trail, these poles are easy to use. While walking with them around Durango, Colorado, they didn’t have the effortless feel of the ultralight weight poles, but were light enough that we never gave them much thought while walking.

Comfort

The cork handles of the Leki Black Series give them a significant advantage in comfort. 

Characteristics like cork handles, padded wrist straps, and ergonomically designed handle grips increased a model’s comfort points. We also deducted points for uncomfortable grips or irritating wrist straps. In the case of the Black Series, the wrist straps are basic with no padding, but at least they do not rub when worn. 

The cork handles are one of the most significant advantages of these poles. They are the only folding poles we tested with cork grips. The cork grips are an advantage for comfort as the cork absorbs moisture to help prevent the hand from becoming sweaty and dirty. 

In the end, these are the white rice of trekking poles. They get the job done, but there’s nothing markedly outstanding about them, either.

Ease of Use

The Black Series poles require some practice but are reasonably easy to use once you get the system down. 

Because these are z-folding poles, a cord runs through the middle of the shaft and connects the three pieces. The cord makes them easier to put together. After clicking the shafts in place, the flick lock must be released, and that shaft section must be pulled upwards. This locks each piece together. The telescoping portion can then be adjusted to the desired length. 

These steps are more complex than other flick-lock or telescoping poles. However, there are also fewer adjustment points as the shafts snap together. When we timed how long it took us to set up these poles, they ranked just above the middle of the pack. 

When using these poles on hikes around Durango, Colorado, our experience was that practice made them faster to set up. Overall, these are about average for ease of use.

Packability

Packability is a strength of the Black Series since they have a folding design. However, they are longer than the other foldable poles in our lineup. 

The Black Series ranks third overall; they are much more compact than most other trekking poles on our list. But compared to the other z-fold models, they ranked at the bottom. The reason for this is that the pole segments are longer on this pole than on others. 

 The key to storing folding poles is that when they are collapsed, they must fit with the strapping system of your pack; otherwise, they can flop out and potentially slip out of your straps. They come with a storage bag, but who uses those on the trail?

Features

Features are an area where the Leki Black Series trekking poles perform well thanks to attributes like the grip extension and included storage bag. Similar to the comfort test, we gave each pole points for including standard or helpful features. Then, we used the points to compare the poles and rank them. 

In the case of the Black Series poles, they included various features such as baskets, wrist straps, replaceable carbide tips, and storage bags. We particularly like the grip extension as it has a pattern that makes it easier to hold and extends well down the pole shaft. The bag is also helpful, as it prevents the poles from getting tangled when stowed away. 

One thing we would like to see included is larger baskets for snow. Other than that, these poles have a lot of great features for a reasonable weight penalty.

Should You Buy The LEKI Black Series FX Carbon Trekking Poles?

We like the Leki Black Series FX Carbon trekking poles because they have reliable performance in every category we tested. They have above-average durability for both carbon fiber and folding trekking poles. They have a modest weight, slightly heavier than their competitors, due to the extra features. 

The Black Series is relatively packable and comfortable. Their good all-around performance means these poles are an excellent choice for those who like folding-style poles, want cork handles,  and are ready to invest in a long-term pair. 

Due to the price, we would not recommend these poles for beginners or those who have not narrowed down what they like in a trekking pole.

What Other Trekking Poles Should You Consider?

We tested a slew of trekking poles. Below are a few that are similar to the Leki Black Series FX Carbon:

Black Diamond Distance Carbon FLZ Review: Another z-folding option, the Distance Carbon poles share many similarities with the Black Series and some differences. These poles are very lightweight and fold down to a tiny size. They are not as durable or feature-packed as the Black Series, but they are great for trail runs and faster hikes. 

Black Diamond Alpine Cork Review: Like the Black Series, the Alpine Cork poles are made of carbon fiber with cork grips. They are also very durable. Unlike the Black Series, the Alpine Cork poles have a telescoping design with flick locks. 

Leki Makalu Cork Lite Review: The Makalu poles are similar to the Black Series, mainly because they are the same brand. Although their weight and packability are not as good as those of the Black Series, they are easier to use. Part of this is due to the telescoping design, which makes set-up a bit faster. These poles also have cork handles but aluminum shafts instead of carbon fiber.

Bottom Line

The Leki Makalu Cork Lite trekking poles are a great mid-tier option for hiking and backpacking. These poles perform well across various areas without being overly specialized in one category. 

We like that these poles are durable and fast to expand or collapse. Multiple features, both for comfort and regular use, provide value on the trail. In particular, we like that these poles have cork handles to absorb sweat and tension adjusters on the flick locks. 

While day hiking with these poles around Durango, Colorado, we found that they don’t shine super brightly in any area, and there aren’t any overly annoying or bad features. They are reliable at a decent price, offering a good bang for your buck. For a side-by-side comparison of the Makalu Cork Lites to our other favorites, head to our best trekking poles gear guide.

Durability

The Makalu Cork Lite strikes a great balance between aluminum durability and low weight. These poles only had a small amount of cosmetic damage from our durability testing. We threw and dropped them on a boulder to confirm they would withstand basic wear and tear. They continue to operate normally, just had a few scratches. We also subjected them to a bend-stress test to determine how easily they would snap. 

The Makalu poles have ample flex but didn’t feel like they would break easily. On our hikes around Durango, they did well enough. We primarily used them in well-trafficked areas, where they performed as expected. These poles will hold up well enough for rugged terrain, but if a moment came where we had some momentum and our body weight came crashing down on these between a rock and a hard place, they might snap at one of the joints.

Weight

The weight of the Makalu is so-so: it is towards the bottom of our list overall, but is the second lightest aluminum pole (1 lb 2. oz for a pair). Aluminum is known for being more durable but also heavier than carbon fiber. Therefore, it is unsurprising that it would rank lower on our list for weight when stacked against carbon poles. 

The weight is not noticeable while hiking with it or when it is the only pole being held. The only time it is evident is when we are holding one of the ultralight poles in a different hand. The benefit of the added weight is that it does not feel flimsy. We didn’t feel the need to be overly careful while hiking with this pole around Durango.

Comfort

We love that the Makalu trekking poles have cork handles, but we wish the wrist straps were a bit more comfortable. Because we get to compare trekking poles side-by-side, comfort is more apparent to us. But for the average buyer, the comfort of these sticks is sufficient.

The Makalu received comfort points for having cork handles and a handle shape of sufficient comfort. We prefer cork over foam because it is generally better at absorbing sweat. While using the Makalu on backpacking trips, our hands stayed cleaner. 

One thing we would have liked to have seen on the Makalu is a padded wrist strap. The current wrist straps work fine for short amounts of time. The fabric is somewhat soft, but the thin width is less comfortable. Overall, the Makalu has average comfort features.

Ease of Use

We found the Leki Makalu easy to use, thanks to easy-to-use flick locks and shafts that slide at a user-friendly speed. To test how easy each trekking pole is to use, we measured the time needed to set them up. The Makalu Cork Lite came in third place once we compared the times of the different trekking poles. 

There are several attributes of these poles that contributed to the Makalu’s taking bronze in the ease-of-use metric. The first is the easy-to-use flick locks. The locking mechanism on these poles is easy to access, and the flipping piece has a small lip that makes it easy to grab. We also like that the mechanism’s tension can be easily adjusted using the nobs on the side of the pole. 

The telescoping portion of the pole can also impact ease of use. The middle shaft is relatively easy to collapse and expand. Still, there is enough friction to keep it from flying out. The lower shaft takes more effort to move. The shafts also have measurements on them to help quickly adjust them to the correct height.

Packability

Packability is not a strong area for the Makalu: it has the longest poles in our lineup. When collapsed, the Leki Makalu came in at 26.5 inches. For reference, the shortest collapsed trekking pole in our lineup is 14.25 inches (this was a folding pole). One upside to this is that the pole has longer, continuous shafts, so they are less likely to break.

Compared to the other telescoping poles we tested, the results are not quite as drastic. They are still in last place, though. We did not find this difference in collapsed length to be an issue when toting the poles around to different trails or in the car. However, this is a more significant problem when flying or fast packing. For the average hiker who doesn’t often need to stash them for scrambling, it won’t make a huge difference.

Features

The Makalu has the basic features needed to be usable, plus a few extras. They have wrist straps and one pair of baskets. We also appreciate that the tips can be replaced when they wear out. The two best features of these poles are the built-in tensioners and grip extension. The tensioners are easy to use and do not require any tools. They make adjusting the force needed to open each flick lock easy. We appreciate that the grip extension is large enough for our hand to hold and has a pattern for a better grip. There could always be more add-ons, such as winter baskets, that could be included. However, overall, the Makalu performs well and keeps its overall weight low.

Should You Buy The LEKI Makalu Cork Lite Trekking Poles?

Our gear analysts have been longtime fans of the Makalu trekking poles. They’ve been trusted on the CDT, Arizona Trail, and countless hikes.

Because these poles have decent durability, comfort, and ease of use, they are a fantastic choice for any trail. These poles would be a good upgrade option from some more affordable but lower-performing models. That said, they are not quite as versatile as some of the other poles on our list. These poles will work best for hiking and backpacking, but aren’t the most compact or ultralight if you’re considering them for fast packing or trail running.

What Other Trekking Poles Should You Consider?

We like the Leki Makalu, but know it is just one of many great trekking poles we tested on our gear guide. Here are a few more to consider:

Black Diamond Pursuit Review: The Pursuit is a great alternative to the Makalu. It is also an aluminum trekking pole with cork handles and a similar price tag. While the flick locks are not quite as easy to use and adjust, we love that these poles have incredible durability and an abundance of features that make them very versatile. These poles can be used for both hiking and skiing.

MSR DynaLock Explore Review: We just love how easy it is to set up the MSR DynaLock Explore. The flick locks on these trekking poles are extremely easy to use and adjust. They are not quite as durable as the Makalu or as light, but the packability and features are very similar for both poles.

Black Diamond Trail Back Review: The Trail Back trekking poles are one of our favorite budget buys, making them great for beginners. They are another aluminum pole but with foam handles instead of cork. One of our favorite things about them is that they have amazing durability—a big improvement over the Makalu. While they are not as quick to set up as the Leki poles, many of their other features, such as comfort and packability, are very similar.

Bottom Line

The MSR DynaLock Explore Carbon trekking poles are a fantastic option on our guide to the best trekking poles for those seeking a well-rounded, telescoping pole.

These poles feature various accessories, including summer and winter baskets, and offer moderate durability, making them an excellent choice for use in all seasons. Even better, these poles are much more affordable than others we tested. Thanks to their price tag and versatility, they are a win-win for us. 

If we had to find fault with these sticks, we wish they weighed a bit less and packed down more. But at 1 lb 3 oz,  they aren’t heavy by any means, just about average for an aluminum trekking pole.

Fortunately, we didn’t feel any fatigue from them while backpacking with these poles in Arizona. They felt comparable to most mid-tier trekking poles in terms of weight, packability, and durability. Overall, these poles make a great choice for the average day hiker or someone who wants trekking poles to use year-round.

Durability

The MSR DynaLock Explore Carbon trekking poles have distinctly average durability. During side-by-side testing, they resisted cosmetic damage and had an average bend. We threw these poles like javelins down a dirt road and dropped them onto a boulder before moving on to the stress test. 

These poles are one of the few that did not sustain any scratches from the testing process. They did have a fair amount of bend to them, and we felt it would be possible to break them with moderate effort. We used these poles while hiking up to Chiricahua Peak in Arizona’s Sky Island region. This hike involved hiking through the snow, where the footing was tricky, and pushing through the brush on the descent. These poles did great and still look brand new after the trip.

Weight

At 9.6 ounces per pole, the Explore poles are on the heavy side overall, but about average for an aluminum trekking pole. 

This is definitely on the heavy end compared to other poles we tested. If we don’t compare them to carbon fiber poles, the weight is more respectable but still below average. These poles feel heavy when held in the hand, but not egregiously so. In the field, the weight isn’t noticeable.

Comfort

The MSR DynaLock Explore trekking poles have some padding on the wrist strap and comfortable grips. We would like the handle better if it were made of cork instead of foam, but that might be because once you go cork, you never…”uncork”. 

One nod to the Explore’s comfort level is its wrist straps. While not especially thick, the wrist straps on these poles have more padding than most of the ones we tested. While using them to climb steep hills in the mountains, we found that the padding along the outer edge made a big difference. 

Other notable comfort features include a well-shaped grip, both in ergonomic design and diameter. The grip shape makes the poles easier and more comfortable to hold. Overall, they are a comfortable pole to use all day.

Ease of Use

The flip locks on the Explore poles are easy to use, but the telescoping shafts are a bit sticky for our tastes. Our ease-of-use test consisted of timing how long it took us to set up each pole for hiking. We then adjusted the rankings based on other factors, such as our experience using them on the trail. The Explore trekking poles performed well when we timed them, scoring second fastest. 

However, we found that the shafts are a bit sticky when using these poles while backpacking in the Chiricahua Mountains. There is friction as the pole shafts slide past each other to expand or collapse. The friction only lasts for the first few inches of each pole but requires extra effort. This can feel frustrating to deal with at the end of the day. 

On the bright side, the flick locks are easy to open and close, thanks to the square shape. They also include built-in tensioners, though they can be clumsy to use because it is difficult to hold the pole and adjust the dial simultaneously.

Packability

The collapsed length measurement of the MSR DynaLock Explore poles is average compared to other trekking poles. We measured the collapsed length of these poles from the top of the grip to the end of the carbide tip. Our measuring tape read 24.5 inches (congruent with MSR’s specs). 

The Explorer poles ranked in the middle of the lineup compared to the other poles we measured. However, it is worth noting that there is a more significant divide between the top half of the lineup and the lower half. This is because trekking poles with a folding design collapse to a much smaller size than a telescoping-style pole. 

The Explore poles are average or slightly above average when compared to other telescoping poles. On the trail, we didn’t notice a vast difference between these poles and the other telescoping models we brought. They all fit the same on the outside of our packs.

Features

We appreciate that the Explore trekking poles have many features, such as two different types of baskets and replaceable carbide tips.

Other included features like tensioners, allow the poles to be easily modified in the field without the need for additional tools. Replaceable carbide tips extend the lifetime of the trekking pole.

Should You Buy The MSR DynaLock Explore Carbon Trekking Poles?

We like the MSR DynaLock Explore trekking poles because they are well-rounded and versatile at a modest price. 

Their biggest strengths are features and moderate durability, making them great for folks who want a pole that can do everything. For example, they can be used for both hiking and snowshoeing. That said, these poles are a bit heavy and not the most compact. Those looking for a trekking pole for light and fast hikes should consider a different option.

What Other Trekking Poles Should You Consider?

We tested many different models in our search for the best trekking pole. Below are a few similar options to the MSR DynaLock Explore.

Black Diamond Pursuit Review: One of our favorite trekking poles, the Pursuit, is a terrific choice for various adventures. Thanks to their great durability and features, we have used these poles while downhill skiing. The biggest difference is that they are a bit more expensive, but have higher overall quality.

Black Diamond Trail Back Review:  A step down from the MSR DynaLock Explore, the Trail Back poles are a more affordable but lower-performing option. They, too, have many included features. We also like that these poles are very sturdy, though they are heavy.

Leki Makalu Cork Lite Review: The Makalu trekking poles are another excellent aluminum trekking pole. Like the other models on this list, they have a telescoping design. This means they do not pack down as small and weigh a bit more, but they also have better durability. A big pro of these poles is that they are easier to expand and collapse than the Explore poles.

Bottom Line

The REI Flash Carbon is a good trekking pole for the everyday hiker. They are lightweight without feeling fragile and have the necessary features to support your strides. 

During testing, we found that these poles had a lighter weight than average, thanks in part to their carbon fiber shafts. While they do feel prone to snapping when leaned on, they survived one of our gear testers falling on top of them as well as use on a very rugged off-trail hike. 

One thing that bothers us about these poles is how difficult they are to expand or collapse. The telescoping poles have a lot of friction, making them difficult to adjust. Even still, they work well for use on day hikes and weekend backpacking trips. See our guide to the best trekking poles to see how the flash carbon poles compare to our other favorites.

Durability

We were a little surprised by the durability performance of the REI Flash Carbon trekking poles after testing was completed. These poles sustained more cosmetic damage than most of the other poles in our lineup, both over the course of side-by-side testing and in the field. They are carbon and they are focused on being lightweight, so they should be treated with some care.

We threw them like a javelin, dropped them on a boulder, and hiked with them through Arizona’s pokey brush. While the damage from these tests and usage was just cosmetic, their performance in our bend test was not as good. These Flash Carbon poles were quite easy to bend and felt as though they would be pretty easy to break. But bending is better than breaking so, take our opinions and factor them into how and the type of terrain you hike over.

While we have some reservations about their lifespan when used regularly in rugged terrain or for winter activities, they performed well in the field. While backpacking in the Chiricahua Mountains one of our gear testers tripped on a bush and fell flat on top of these poles. Surprisingly, there wasn’t any damage to the poles. They also did well being used in an off trail wash where it was necessary to climb over burnt trees and down small rock waterfalls.

Weight

The Flash Carbon trekking poles are lighter than average, although they are slightly heavier than most of the other carbon fiber poles we tested. We place these poles on a kitchen scale to see if there are any disparities from the listed weight. They weighed in at 6.6 ounces per pole, slightly lighter than the weight listed on REI’s website. While hiking with these poles in Arizona, they definitely felt lighter than the aluminum poles that we are more used to using.

Comfort

Just like weight, the REI Flash Carbon poles are slightly above average for comfort, thanks to a comfortable grip and better-shaped wrist straps. We counted the number of features that make each trekking pole more comfortable and added them together to better compare the poles we tested. 

REI opted for foam handles, which typically allow sweat to accumulate on the outside and get the hands dirty. Foam also does not absorb shock from the ground as well, though this feature is usually less noticeable. The shape of the grip was natural and comfortable.

We appreciate that the wrist strap is slightly wider than those of some other poles we tested. We find that wider straps are more comfortable to wear, especially when used for full days of hiking. 

There is also a liner sewn onto the inside, which is soft for increased comfort. While we prefer padded wrist straps more for comfort, REI managed a nice balance of comfort and weight savings.

Ease of Use

The Flash Carbon is one of our least favorite trekking poles to set up due to the sticky shafts. We based most of our rankings on the time it takes to expand a pole to walking height. This allowed us to better compare ease of use across the various poles in our lineup. Even though the Flash Carbon poles had a respectable setup time, we had to move them down on the list because they are just really annoying to fuss with. 

The flick locks are okay; it is the shafts that are the problem. When telescoping shafts are being extended, it is not uncommon for some friction to occur. In fact, this is a good thing because it keeps them from easily sliding all the way out. 

However, the shafts on the Flash Carbon poles have a ton of friction. The lowest shaft in particular takes significant effort to slide open. Another problem is that the bottom shaft does not have any measurements listed. This makes it harder to determine when the pole has been set to the correct height and typically results in more time spent tweaking the length. On the bright side, these poles do have built-in adjusters for the flick lock tension. The flipping pieces can be turned to adjust the tension.

Packability

Overall, the Flash Carbon poles are slightly below average in terms of packability, but about average when compared to other telescoping poles. We measured the length of each pole when fully collapsed so that we could find out which is the most packable. 

After measuring the Flash Carbon poles, they came in at exactly 25 inches. This is the same as what is listed on the REI website. Because this length is longer than some of the others we tested, these poles will be less ideal for activities such as trail running or flying with the poles. For the average backpacker, it shouldn’t make a huge difference. 

We had these poles stowed away on our pack for two days while hiking in the Chiricahua Mountains. The length of the poles was not noticeable while they were attached to our pack.

Features

We found the REI Flash Carbon poles to be surprisingly lacking in features. After tallying the number of features each pole has and comparing them, we found that these poles are below average. The Flash Carbon poles come with the bare minimum, including wrist straps and a pair of summer baskets. 

We also appreciate that the tension of the flick locks is easily adjustable without the need for tools. That said, we are disappointed that these trekking poles do not have replaceable carbide tips like most other poles. This decreases the overall value of the poles because the lifespan of these trekking poles will be shorter as a result. These poles also do not have a grip extension. This is somewhat forgivable, as not having them helps to save weight.

Should You Buy The REI Flash Carbon Trekking Poles?

The Flash Carbon is great for folks who want a lightweight, no-frills trekking pole. One of its strongest performance areas is weight, as it is one of the lightest poles we tested. It also is a fairly simple trekking pole with few add-ons. 

For the average hiker using this pole on day hikes and weekend backpacking trips, this pole should be more than sufficient to get the job done. That said, other poles are more affordable for beginners or higher caliber for intrepid adventures.

What Other Trekking Poles Should You Consider?

The REI Flash Carbon trekking poles are just one of the many styles we tested. Here are a few others that we love!

Black Diamond Pursuit Review: We love the Pursuit because it is extremely versatile and performed at or above average in all of our tests. This pole is made of aluminum instead of carbon fiber. The result is that it is much stronger than the Flash Carbon trekking poles, but also weighs about two ounces more. 

MSR DynaLock Explore Review: Another great telescoping option is the MSR DynaLock Explore. While it weighs a bit more due to its aluminum frame, it is also much easier to use thanks to shafts that easily slide. This pole also has a few more features and a more affordable price tag.

Durston Iceline Review: If weight and a simplistic design are your requirements, consider giving the Durston Iceline a try. The Iceline trekking poles are among the lightest we tested, making them nice for longer adventures. One thing that is a bit different about these poles is their unique hybrid design: they have a folding section that completely detaches as well as a telescoping portion. Overall, we really loved these poles for their high level of performance across the board.